Raul Naupari
raulnq

raulnq

Measuring Performance in .NET: Single Purpose vs Monolithic Lambda Function

Measuring Performance in .NET: Single Purpose vs Monolithic Lambda Function

Raul Naupari's photo
Raul Naupari
·Oct 31, 2022·

2 min read

Subscribe to my newsletter and never miss my upcoming articles

Play this article

Single Purpose and Monolithic Lambda Functions are two approaches to developing and deploying our applications (you can check the pros and cons here). But what are the differences from the performance perspective?

To answer this question, we develop two applications. One using .NET 6 Minimal API (Monolithic Lambda Function) and the other using the AWS Lambda Project Template (Single Purpose Lambda Function) from the NuGet package Amazon.Lambda.Templates, both are going to do the same (the code can be found here):

  • Receives an HTTP request from API Gateway.
  • Store the request in a DynamoDb table.
  • Send a message to an SQS queue.
  • Return an HTTP response.

For both Lambda Functions, we are using 512 Mb. For testing (three times), we are using K6 with the following workloads:

  • One user for four minutes.
  • Two concurrent users for four minutes.
  • Three concurrent users for four minutes.

Let's take a look at the results of the first run:

ApplicationMinAvgMaxMedianP95P99
Monolithic25ms48ms2054ms36ms85ms116ms
Single Purpose25ms46ms1296ms37ms79ms119ms

Second execution:

ApplicationMinAvgMaxMedianP95P99
Monolithic25ms48ms2012ms37ms69ms99ms
Single Purpose25ms45ms1186ms36ms75ms114ms

Last execution:

ApplicationMinAvgMaxMedianP95P99
Monolithic27ms50ms1910ms40ms70ms119ms
Single Purpose27ms46ms1043ms37ms72ms114ms

As we can see the average response times are quite the same, and we could state that there is no difference between the two approaches. The real difference comes when we see the maximum response time which is related to the cold starts. The cold start produced by the Monolithic Lambda Function is higher than the Single Purpose Lambda Function option. This makes sense since the .NET 6 Minimal API has more code to load when compared to the AWS Lambda Project Template.

To confirm that the maximum response times are caused by the cold start, we enabled X-Ray in both applications to analyze the slowest requests (from the third run). Monolithic Lambda Function:

image.png

Single Purpose Lambda Function:

image.png

While the advantages of using the .NET 6 Minimal API to build our applications are great, there is a price to pay (longer cold start time) when using AWS Lambda as a deployment strategy. If your application needs to be as fast as possible on every request, we might suggest using the Single Purpose approach. And thinking even further, if the request duration is a requirement in your application, perhaps we could move away from the serverless approach and use Beanstalk or EKS to host our applications. Thanks, and happy coding.

 
Share this